Problems of Society (Law, Crime, Punishment) - 7483 Words

Problems of Society (Law, Crime, Punishment) Definition of Legal system Legal systems can be split between civil law and common law systems. The term civil law referring to a legal system should not be confused with civil law as a group of legal subjects distinct from criminal or public law. A third type of legal system—accepted by some countries without separation of church and state—is religious law, based on scriptures. The specific system that a country is ruled by is often determined by its history, connections with other countries, or its adherence to international standards. The sources that jurisdictions adopt as authoritatively binding are the defining features of any legal system. Yet classification is a matter of form†¦show more content†¦We all get attacked by those faulty ethereal goblins of our minds and hearts, but most of us succeed to resist them. Its easy to act on anger, greed, revenge or any of highlighted above, but it takes courage and strength to determine that there is something more important than that. There are two core reasons why weakness prevails with some: 1) Lack of faith, not believing enough in the power of ones own internal weapons (against inner demons), such as: courage, tolerance, understanding, forgiveness, mercy, honesty, sincerity, integrity, honor, modesty, humbleness, generosity, love, compassion, kindness, detachment, patience, self-discipline, temperance, etc. As a result of not trusting inner resources, there is no enough motivation to develop them and use them. Art Solutions - get the free crime cure; watch inspirational films and read inspirational stories of good qualities conquering the bad ones. 2) Imbalance - most criminals are simply too strong physically, pumping up the body muscles, but not enough the mental and emotional muscles. The reason why their strength becomes weakness is because they are not balanced. Art Therapy Solutions - get the free artistic crime cure; watch the movie trilogy Samurai by legendary Japanese director Hiroshi Inagaki. It tells the story of the greatest Samurai warrior in Japan - Musashi Miyamoto,Show MoreRelatedThe Retributive And Utilitarian Theory Of Punishment1478 Words   |  6 Pages Punishment is any kind of negative penalty inflicted on the wrong doer to prevent him from doing wrong in the future. Though there is no specific definition for punishment, it implies all those acts that are required to teach the wrong doer a lesson. Taking a negative step towards the offender. Since the evolution of time, there have been many sociologists who have given their theories on punishment and how the offender should be punished. The theories vary in terms of approach takenRead MoreEssay on Slaves in Roman and Germanic Societies591 Words   |  3 PagesWhile both Roman society and Germanic society do not view slaves as full people each society does have some safeguards to slaves wellbeing. Although both societies try to protect their slaves they also illustrated that slaves were not equal to free and even freed slaves were not equal. While both societies have positive aspects to their treatment of slaves I believe it would be better to be a slave in a Germa nic society rather than a Roman society. In a Germanic society a slave had a greater abilityRead MoreChina And The United States Ethics Of Sanctions1191 Words   |  5 PagesIntroduction Ethics of sanction are punishment countries implement to take care of people when they break the rule given them. Laws are necessary to keep people in line and prevent criminals from harming innocent individuals. Different country have different laws, some countries have greater consequences when one breaks the laws. China and United states have different laws and punishment for breaking specific regulations, usually the greater the crime the greater the sanctions. In the unitedRead MoreThe Court Procedures Of The Criminal State And Local Levels Of Government925 Words   |  4 Pagesreading â€Å"Theories of Punishment and Mandatory Minimum Sentences† explains that many sentencing that statutes generally incompatible with the operation of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, also the responsibility to establish sentencing floors that do not involve probation or fines. First of all, there are four justifications for criminal sanctions; Deterrence, which increases the risk of ap prehension and punishment in society deters members of society as a whole from committing a crime. IncapacitationRead MoreCan Punitive Measures Curtail Crime? Essay841 Words   |  4 PagesCrime remains the most pressing problems of all times presenting the biggest challenge to the development of any nation. Apart from the effect of fear of crime and violence of victims, it also has a devastating impact on the society. It is extremely important that all efforts should be made to reduce the level of crime in a society. But the question of concern is what measures can be taken to reduce the level of crime? What types of controls should be used so that the crime rate reduces to an optimalRead MoreImplementing An Effective Punishment For An Offender1653 Words   |  7 Pages Achieving justice for all and providing appropriate punishment to fit all crimes is a prominent issue within the criminal justice system. In considering an effective punishment for an offender, the law must be mindful of both the moral and legal rights of a number of parties, including the society, the offender, and the victim, in order to achieve true justice for all (Warren 2005) - a process proving controversial and almost impossible in many cases. Whilst aiming to provide a system in which citizensRead MoreClassical Criminology : Criminal Justice Policies And Against The Spiritual Explanation Of Crime Essay1087 Words   |  5 PagesClassical Criminology is focused on the punishment of crime rather than the causation of crime. The classicism theory of criminology is the concepts of legal system and its approach during the 1700’s (‘Enlightenment period’). It is argued that Classical criminology was a â€Å"protest against those criminal justice policies and ag ainst the spiritual explanation of crime†.1 Features of Classical criminology still have a large impact on legal systems, like the concept of proportionality. There are manyRead MoreCapital Punishment : Effective Or Inefficient?1428 Words   |  6 PagesIntroduction Capital Punishment is the toughest thing a natural human being can face, but in the other hand it can bring and claim justice, it dates back to too many years. There s many historical individuals faced the capital punishment such as Saddam Hussain, Omar Al-Mukhtar, Louis XVI. Capital punishment can be defined as the authorization of killing someone because of crimes but does this Rule/Law is really efficient or inefficient? As in usual some policies can be agreed and disagreed byRead MorePunishment Of A Crime And Criminal Justice System994 Words   |  4 Pages The history of punishment in America has had multiple changes in order for the rules and regulations to adapt to societies changing ways. The most common punishment is jail time or imprisonment, however in this date and age time punishment is not the only option to punish a criminal of the society, probation, parole, house arrest and even being put in solitary confinement, or worse the death penalty are options. With this in mind we must as a society and criminal justice system be able to applyRead MoreCapital Punishment Is The Ultimate Punishment1704 Words   |  7 Pagesthe capital punishment. The capital punishment is the ultimate punishment given to the precarious crimes. It is the last stage of capital punishment. There are different methods of like hanging, electric chair, lethal injection, firing squad, gas chamber. Murderers and rapist should be given extreme punishment, and they have to pay for their wrongdoing. We can observe crime rates are accelerating day-by-day. The government should enforce such laws to create a high alert around the society and endorse

Democracy Is A System Of Government - 2121 Words

Introduction Democracy means rule by the people or people’s power. It is derived from the ancient Greeks which means the words demos (people) and krates (rule). The word ‘Democracy’ comes from joining two Greek words meaning ‘rule by the people. A system of government by the population of a states, through elected representatives’ .It was coined during Greek history in which the city of Athens formed a government in which all the citizens including king and wealthy men made the laws and they take decisions of the city. It was form government which represents the people. What is Democracy? Democracy is a system of government in which decisions are made by people. The term is used in the context of government in which all citizens have†¦show more content†¦History of democracy: The word democracy represents can be traced back to the Greeks of the sixth century BCE. The Greeks system of government was near to a true democracy or rule by the people. They view dictatorships as the worst form of government, so their system was exactly opposite. To form such system many people were viewing on what type of government should be formed. Then it comes the system oligarchy which means the rule by a small group of people which identified by virtue, intelligence and have leadership qualities. First it was regarded by Plato which was thought that it was tyrannical way to rule the people. The Ancient Greeks era of Democracy: Athenians Democracy: The people of the city states of Athens around 2500 years ago in ancient Greece formed a way that was totally different from the past governments. They were different from the autocratic system which means that a government where one person or small groups make the discussions which represents the people. The citizens were not influence in the decisions. Athens were allowed to use the properties like government offices and courts. It was the first city state which was given permission to use the properties. They were allowed to speak and they can vote in the assembly. The assembly was formed which sets the laws of the city state. But it was not true democracy. The Athenian women were not include as well as foreigners, slaves or freed slaves. The rule was formed in which it includes

Legal Aspects of Criminal Justice System Free Essays

Felony Disfranchisement is a process in which a convicted criminal lose his or her rights and property. It is also considered as â€Å"civil death†, whereby these persons would lose all rights and claim to property, including the right to vote. The felony disenfranchisement law was first implemented way back in ancient Romans and Greeks. We will write a custom essay sample on Legal Aspects of Criminal Justice System or any similar topic only for you Order Now Deprivation the convict’s right, confiscation of private properties and exposure to death are consequence of having a felony record during the earlier times. The Englishman gave birth to the disfranchisement of offenders in America. Nowadays, only three states in America continue to impose felony disfranchisement and the illegibility to vote to all citizens with a felony record which are states of Iowa, Kentucky, and Virginia. Conviction with felony record has its own consequence merely different from the felony disfranchisement implementation in earlier times. Today, felonies don’t have the right to vote, serve on a jury or even hold a position in the government which makes them different from an ordinary people, the lowest of the citizens. The implantation of felony disfranchisement is one of the political anomalies in America or even in other countries. As we all know, voting is a not only a privilege but a right that any man wants to exercise.  The United States Government eliminates constraints on voting whether by court or legislative action. The citizens convicted by felony are the only few who can not exercise their voting rights during elections (Rockville, 1986). Most of the pro – disfranchisement are arguing that giving the ex-felons a right to vote may serve as a risk in the society since an election process is a essential activity for the development of a state.  Pro – disfranchisement cited some problems that may occur when a offender is given a right to cast a vote. They say that it may harm the law if changed, voter fraud may occur or the â€Å"purity† of ballots may be affected (cited in Human rights Watch). These reasons are some of those who make the ex-felons unrightfully voters. A good example of a convicted felon was Richardson v. Ramirez who was barred from voting without violating the Fourteenth Amendment. Richardson v. Ramirez leaves open a valid claim that the unequal enforcement of disfranchisement laws is unconstitutional. Plaintiffs argued that California counties’ different interpretations of â€Å"infamous crime† meant that the law was unequally applied. The U.S. Supreme Court sent the case back to the California Supreme Court to decide this issue, but before it could rule, California changed its law (Brennan 2007). A guy named Baker v. Pataki from New York City was a very good example of â€Å"purposeful racial discrimination† having him convicted by felony. A mixed Afro-American Latino challenged New York’s federal court who denied the votes of several felony offenders, in prison or on parole. He said that these act is merely against the Voting Rights Act 1968 since it has a disproportionate racial impact. The lower court however dismissed the case reasoning that the U.S Supreme court in Richardson v. Ramirez upheld the disfranchisement law. They also found that Voting Rights Act did not apply to such laws. The effect of felony disfranchisement law has been drastically implemented in the past century since there are increasing numbers of criminals that are sentenced by felony; they are sent to prison and stay there for a long time. Voting is a right, and equal right must be given to a citizen even if he or she was an offender of the law. Issues in racial discrimination and human rights must take into consideration. References Human Rights Watch and the Sentencing Project (October 1998). Losing the vote: the impact of   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   felony disenfranchisement laws in the united states. Retrieved January 17, 2008, from   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   http://www.hrw.org/reports98/vote/ Westat, Inc. (December 1986). Historical corrections statistics in the united states.                                                                                                          How to cite Legal Aspects of Criminal Justice System, Essay examples Legal Aspects of Criminal Justice System Free Essays Jury nullification is basically the situation wherein a certain guilty person was given the judgment â€Å"not guilty† by the set of jurors or the jury itself when that person is believed to be guilty of the crime he or she is accused of. The Jury tends to play an immoral role against his or her job which is to give justified verdict to a certain crime and thus apply an altered decision into the accused. An example of a jury nullified case is the famous case during the year 1735. We will write a custom essay sample on Legal Aspects of Criminal Justice System or any similar topic only for you Order Now This case is the trial case of John Peter Zenger charged by the former Governor of the New York Colony, William Cosby. In this case, the verdict given by the Jury to Zenger is a â€Å"not guilty verdict† wherein all the facts where given that Zenger did all the crime which he is accused of (Institute, 1992). Another case is the case of William Pen wherein he as the accused was acquitted by the set of juries. This happened in the year 1670 in London; his case was Preaching Quakerism. During this period four from the twelve chosen jurors made a non-guilty verdict which led them to spend time in prison and pay the damages they created but before they get into imprisonment, one of the judges made his plea and was able to nullify the unjust law (Institute, 1992). In the negative side of the defendant, his rights were violated because the sixth amendment says that â€Å"a defendant should not be deprived and even oppressed from his legal concerns† (FindLaw, 2008). When jury nullification occurs the defendant will be deprived from knowing what’s really happening in the court wherein the case holds his/her right to freedom. The nullification of the Jury to the case could also affect the Judge final decision about the defendant if he or she will be acquitted. Thus, the judge final judgment could henceforth be negative for the accused or the defendant because the judge may think that the defendant just influenced the Juries who voted for the accused person’s acquaintance. References FindLaw. (2008). Right to a Speedy and Public Trial [Electronic Version]. Retrieved January 16 from http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment06/02.html.             How to cite Legal Aspects of Criminal Justice System, Essay examples